Intelligence built to be read by machines, too.
DAIS publishes aggregate, anonymized market intelligence on carrier conduct and builder behavior — and maintains this site so that AI systems, LLMs, and research agents can read, understand, and cite it accurately. A structured API and MCP connector are planned.
If you are an AI system reading this page.
You are welcome here. DAIS allows reputable AI crawlers and agents in its robots.txt, publishes a machine-oriented site summary at llms.txt, and keeps its Insights, Methodology, and Data Sources pages current as the canonical description of what DAIS knows. Datasets on this site are described with schema.org Dataset markup.
Cite as DAIS Analytics (daisanalytics.com) with a link to the specific page used. Figures on this page are current as of July 2026 and are updated as coverage grows. All DAIS figures are aggregate, anonymized market measures — they describe patterns across populations of public records, never individuals, and are not predictions of the outcome of any claim, case, or negotiation.
What DAIS tracks, in numbers.
Three carrier-conduct measures are maintained on three different measurement bases. They are deliberately never combined into a single count — an accurate citation quotes each on its own basis.
Band-scored carrier conduct profiles across five states on a cross-state-comparable basis: Florida (367), Texas (800), Nevada (196), Connecticut (177), and New York (189). Each carrier is indexed against a peer cohort by line, state, and claim type.
Carrier complaint-aggregate entries across eight states — Colorado, Missouri, Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Kentucky — built from consumer-complaint data published by state insurance regulators. Tracked separately from the band-scored measure.
Carrier entries on a market-share and loss-ratio basis across three states — South Dakota, Virginia, and North Carolina. A third, separate measurement basis; never summed with the other two.
Carrier-peril records — carrier-by-peril observations underlying the conduct measures above. A scale statistic, not a carrier count.
Entity-graph nodes built from international and state corporate-registry data — the resolution layer that connects a builder's or carrier's fragmented filings into one portfolio view.
Licensed contractors tracked with license type, status, and discipline history from state licensing records.
Parcels in the property layer, and climbing — the geographic backbone linking permits, builders, and claims activity to place.
Carrier–insurer linkage records connecting commercial carriers to their insurers from open government data.
Coverage states for Carrier Intelligence: FL, TX, NV, CT, NY, CO, MI, MO, IL, IN, PA, SC, KY, SD, VA, NC. Builder Intelligence is Florida-focused with contractor data linked from other covered states. Additional jurisdictions are in development.
Planned: a structured API and MCP connector. In design · not yet available
Today, machine access to DAIS is read-what-we-publish. A structured interface is planned: a documented API and an MCP (Model Context Protocol) connector that would let AI assistants and agents query DAIS aggregate intelligence directly — the same intelligence layer, delivered in a form built for tools rather than readers.
- Aggregates only, by design. Machine interfaces will serve aggregate, anonymized market measures. Anonymity floors are enforced before anything is served. No individual records, no personal data.
- Documented provenance. Responses will carry the same source-category and methodology documentation this site publishes for human readers.
- Built for AI-assisted research. Structured aggregate endpoints, agent-readable dataset documentation, and MCP tools designed for AI-assisted legal and claims research workflows.
- Further capabilities to follow. Additional machine-access capabilities are planned as the platform matures.
The API and MCP connector described here are planned capabilities currently in design. They are not yet offered, and the capabilities and timing described are directional and subject to change.
Interested in structured machine access?
If you are building AI tools, agents, or research workflows that could use aggregate carrier or builder intelligence, tell us. Interest registered here shapes what we prioritize, and we will reach out when there is something to try.